Dear Sandy:

Just a few lines to thank you for your participation and sharing your expertice in the selection of the jury in my trials.

Even though I was very satisfied with your services, Hopefully I will not need to have to use them again.

I also look forward to continue our friendship.

Dear Sandy:

I am long overdue in writing (as I have previously verbalized) how appreciative I and our clients were with the excellent work, both with respect to the jury and your overall litigation support services which you rendered in connection with the trial of this matter.

As you know, when I took over the lead responsibility for the trial, the plaintiffs were demanding a huge settlement and the defense's prospects were decidedly bleak. At the end of a multi-month trial (which several persons have told us was the largest civil jury trial in the federal court in Miami in recent years), the case was settled very favorably to the defense on the eve of summations. Indeed, Larry Bonner and I, as lead trial counsel, were anxious to sum up and were approaching the verdict with optimism. Your work was instrumental in helping get us there.

Apart from your thoughtful and instructive advice regarding the jury, your assistance before and throughout the trial greatly enhanced our ability to evaluate the evidence and to refine and implement our strategy. The focus group and mock trial you arranged and conducted prior to the trial was a watershed in our thinking and our presentation of the case. All of your services, ranging from simply helping us develop charts and other demonstrative materials to your thoughts regarding our approach and your assistance in the preparation of witnesses, were of the highest qualitv and of significant value to us.

As you know from our dealings since the settlement, I have every intention of bringing you in to help us on other cases wherever possible.

Dear Sandy:

I am writing to express my gratitude for working with me in the case of Stephen B. Fainsbert. As you know, the jury acquitted our client of 17 counts, including RICO, RICO conspiracy, money laundering, obstruction of justice, pejury and other serious crimes. The acquittal certainly would not have been possible without your invaluable contributions in jury selection and the selection of charts which were utilized as visual aids during trial.

Your ideas and comments regarding jury selection and the graphics were the difference. This was a very complex case which included over 1300 exhibits admitted into evidence during the course of the trial. Without your assistance, I could not have simplified my theory sufficiently to make it understandable and persuasive to the jury. I look forward to working with you in future cases.

On behalf of Stephen Fainsbert and our firm, I wish to extend, once again, my gratitude and congratulations for your contributions to this case. Thanks to you, our client is where he belongs -- practicing law in California.

Dear Mr. Marks:

I cannot thank you enough for your help. Your assistance in trial preparation, including voire dire questions, jury selection and beyond was a major factor in my achieving a superb settlement in a wrongful death case during trial and a $347,500.00 verdict in an elevator accident case when the offer was only $15,000!

Your ability to help me seat the best possible jury and present my case in the most convincing manner is a fabulous skill of yours which I will call upon whenever I have the chance.

Dear Mr. Marks:

I wanted to thank you for your assistance and insight during the jury simulations in the Felton case. Even without having seen your report on the two simulations, I found the experience to be incredibly valuable. I look forward to reviewing your report and to discussing our strategy, with you.

I am quite sure that we will be working together aqain the future.